Search for the investment or how to choose an investment project. The choice of investments, how to calculate the risk and calculate the cost of the project with a small deviation from the actual implementation? Many of these issues are constantly worried about the investor. The financial viability of the project, with the same project with the same data in different ways influence the choice of the investor. Suppose we have a project, good looking project, and we create a business plan hope all performance indicators, but when receiving the result, we get different results for the project owner, the investor of the project, and project manager, because the business plan alone, but the views on project are different. For example, the project owner pays attention to the net income minus the project equity, dividends, interest payments and so on, because the owner of the project are interested in earnings, which he will receive for the project, as well as looking at a project lender, investor? An investor invests money in a project looking at the internal rate of return because it is the interest that he can recapture from project, if we assume an investor comes to the company and begins to offer investors a profitable business, the percentage that an investor wishes to receive from the project, of course, comes from the internal rate of return for this course investor, because the internal rate of return – is the highest percentage generated by the project, that the investor is well, then the owner is not good. Investor pays attention to the overall project generated cash flow, it must know where he can at any moment to take money and leave the project, leaving the project on their own. This is one of the types of project risks, the views on the project from all its members are different, and this point must keep in mind.
Tag: Control
Articulating
And that we should look at the whole situation to see new opportunities and develop the system collective activities of his subjects as a whole. The king laughed at the sage and continue to put out fires and prop up the falling roof. A wise man went to the king of a neighboring state, and, after brief reflection principle found solution of similar problems, he suggested to the king to increase his power and influence of its neighbors to the people to build roads and create conditions for the smooth implementation of trade within his kingdom. Through some time the state began to flourish, and captured the territory of the king who refused to listen to the sage. Refusal of a systemic approach, a desire to break the situation in a holistic set of independent tasks and find a solution for each of them separately – so you can be called a defect described thinking.
Analyzing the five described in this text defective thinking, I want to emphasize what is common to characterize them all. These defects demonstrate that the continuous process of thinking, the vast majority of owners and top managers of the business is missing. By a continuous process of thinking I see constant activity in the area of thinking, divided into the following steps: 1) The situation in general, the ability to see and describe the situation as a system of interacting subjects, conditions, rules, regulations, trends, and objective circumstances. 2) A clear definition of self-interest in the situation, as well as the interests of other participants. 3) Articulating own goal in the situation, as well as those of other participants. 4) The definition of the project, plan and program of action to achieve goals. 5) Choice for each of the methods and means for its enforcement, by itself, taking action, the analysis of local results of each action.